Most people would say that if the buyer knows of a defect that makes the asking price (in effect) fraudulent, then he should disclose that information. Of course if the defect if obvious, or should be obvious to a competent observer, that's a different story.
But suppose it's a negative defect, or in other words a huge bonus value, and it's the buyer who knows?
For example, was the buyer obliged to reveal that this object was worth at least 100 times the asking price?
But suppose it's a negative defect, or in other words a huge bonus value, and it's the buyer who knows?
For example, was the buyer obliged to reveal that this object was worth at least 100 times the asking price?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Do you have suggestions on where we could find more examples of this phenomenon?