My wife and I met when we were both working at the Federal Trade Commission, in our nation's capital. I worked for Regulatory Analysis (or "Reg-A" as we called it). She worked for Consumer Protection.
Fraudulent advertising is against the law*, and misrepresentation of a product is a tort.
So....did this guy have a cause of action?
*The "Wood Products Labeling Act" may be of particular relevance here.
Fraudulent advertising is against the law*, and misrepresentation of a product is a tort.
So....did this guy have a cause of action?
*The "Wood Products Labeling Act" may be of particular relevance here.
Caveat fornicator
ReplyDelete