tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5698599151422542939.post5900809445301071733..comments2023-09-21T05:14:00.254-04:00Comments on Euvoluntary Exchange: Guilt as CoercionMungowitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02340064320347875601noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5698599151422542939.post-26943958298564072272012-12-03T18:48:42.605-05:002012-12-03T18:48:42.605-05:00I understand the difference between cases one and ...I understand the difference between cases one and two and cases three and five, but I don't think any of them are euvoluntary, since they involve coercion by circumstance, and I don't mean BATNA.<br /><br />Making a mistake, feeling guilty, and trying to make it better means you're "coerced" (air quotes) by society and the impartial spectator which it hath wrought. The exchange with the florist is not euvoluntary.<br /><br />Does bring up the question of whether euvoluntarity can be brought within the individual (intraction? internal transaction?) or is a wholly social concept.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16153702750268298333noreply@blogger.com